Planning system

Jersey’s planning system is not fit for purpose. It is slow, inflexible and overly complex, and it has become a major obstacle for businesses, homeowners and developers. Much of the problem stems from an outdated and rigid Island Plan, which no longer reflects the needs of the Island.

The current Plan has the official title “Bridging Island Plan 2022–25”. The fact that we are now well into 2026 and still operating under a bridging plan which is out of date speaks volumes about the system’s failings.

Feedback from Islanders reinforces this. A Residential Consumer Research Report, included in a study published by the Jersey Competition and Regulatory Authority, found that the planning process was perceived negatively. Those with experience of the system described it as “frustrating”, “bureaucratic” and “inefficient.” The process was seen as long‑winded and poorly coordinated, with paperwork causing significant delays.

A common frustration was that decisions often appeared subjective and inconsistent, with applicants receiving a default “no” without clear justification. This left many unsure how to address issues or improve their applications. There was also criticism of strict adherence to guidelines that were viewed as impractical or counterproductive.

While there have been signs of improvement recently, the system still falls far short of what Islanders should expect. A combination of policy and practice changes is required:

• Amending the Bridging Island Plan, including removing provisions that effectively prevent derelict greenhouse sites from being redeveloped.

• Accelerating the preparation of a new, more flexible Island Plan.

• Extending permitted development rights, following the recent consultation – which closed in September but has not yet resulted in action.

• Reviewing all supplementary guidance notes, taking account of cost implications, overlap with other requirements and conflicts with other government policies.

• Aligning space standards with those in England and rescinding the decision requiring a parking space for every residential unit.

• Substantially reducing documentation requirements for planning applications.

• Applying heritage considerations proportionately, balancing preservation with viability and other important factors.

• Significantly reducing conditions attaching to planning approvals.

• Simplifying the entire planning process, making it more predictable, efficient and user‑friendly.